Section 1: Introductory Statistics |
Section 2: Program Model and Literacy Instruction |
Section 3: NES Ethnicity |
Section 4: Economic Demographics |
Section 5: Demographic Comparison |
Section 6: Staffing |
Language Proficiency of Teachers | |
---|---|
NATIONAL (n=248)
134 (55%) programs report 100% of teachers are proficient in both languages 34 (14%) programs report 79-99% of teachers are proficient in both languages 21 (8%) programs report 51-75% of teachers are proficient in both languages 26 (10%) programs report 50% of teachers are proficient in both languages 11 (4%) programs report 0-49% of teachers are proficient in both languages 22 (9%) unreported |
|
CALIFORNIA (n=86)
60 (70%) programs report 100% of teachers are proficient in both languages 10 (12%) programs report 79-99% of teachers are proficient in both languages 4 (5%) programs report 51-75% of teachers are proficient in both languages 2 (2%) programs report 50% of teachers are proficient in both languages 1 (1%) programs report 0-49% of teachers are proficient in both languages 9 (10%) unreported |
|
TEXAS (n=34)
14 (40%) programs report 100% of teachers are proficient in both languages 7 (21%) programs report 79-99% of teachers are proficient in both languages 2 (6%) programs report 51-75% of teachers are proficient in both languages 5 (15%) programs report 50% of teachers are proficient in both languages 3 (9%) programs report 0-49% of teachers are proficient in both languages 3 (9%) unreported |
|
NEW YORK (n=20)
9 (45%) programs report 100% of teachers are proficient in both languages 2 (10%) programs report 79-99% of teachers are proficient in both languages 2 (10%) programs report 51-75% of teachers are proficient in both languages 5 (25%) programs report 50% of teachers are proficient in both languages 0 programs report 0-49% of teachers are proficient in both languages 2 (10%) unreported |
Language Proficiency of Support Staff | |
---|---|
NATIONAL (n=248)
72 (28%) programs report 100% of staff are proficient in both languages 19 (8%) programs report 79-99% of staff are proficient in both languages 19 (8%) programs report 51-75% of staff are proficient in both languages 19 (8%) programs report 50% of staff are proficient in both languages 14 (6%) programs report 0-49% of staff are proficient in both languages 59 (23%) unreported 46 (19%) have no support staff |
|
CALIFORNIA (n=86)
28 (33%) programs report 100% of staff are proficient in both languages 5 (6%) programs report 79-99% of staff are proficient in both languages 3 (3%) programs report 51-75% of staff are proficient in both languages 2 (2%) programs report 50% of staff are proficient in both languages 7 (8%) programs report 0-49% of staff are proficient in both languages 37 (43%) unreported 4 (5%) have no support staff |
|
TEXAS (n=34)
15 (43%) programs report 100% of staff are proficient in both languages 3 (9%) programs report 79-99% of staff are proficient in both languages 2 (6%) programs report 51-75% of staff are proficient in both languages 2 (6%) programs report 50% of staff are proficient in both languages 2 (6%) programs report 0-49% of staff are proficient in both languages 6 (18%) unreported 4 (12%) have no support staff |
|
NEW YORK (n=20)
4 (20%) programs report 100% of staff are proficient in both languages 3 (15%) programs report 79-99% of staff are proficient in both languages 1 (5%) program reports 51-75% of staff are proficient in both languages 3 (15%) programs report 50% of staff are proficient in both languages 0 programs report 0-49% of staff are proficient in both languages 7 (35%) unreported 2 (10%) have no support staff |
Section 1: Introductory Statistics |
Section 2: Program Model and Literacy Instruction |
Section 3: NES Ethnicity |
Section 4: Economic Demographics |
Section 5: Demographic Comparison |
Section 6: Staffing |